All posts by Steve Lovell

2023 Round Up

The following text was written for the local press, but in the event they went with a rather shorter article of their own, focussed on the award to Bob Jones. If you find the included puzzle a bit on the easy side, then remember it was intended for a general readership!

The 40th Bury St Edmunds Chess Congress took place on Saturday 7th and Sunday 8th October.

Over 100 players fought for more than £2,500 in prizes at last weekend at Moreton Hall Community Centre. The five-round event ran in four sections:  Open, for the strongest and highest-rated players, Major (for players with an English Chess Federation rating of under-1900), Inter (under-1700) and Minor (under-1500).

The Swiss pairing system used in such events means that, in theory all players might play in all five rounds of the event. In practice only around half of the competitors played all rounds, with others playing in four or fewer rounds due to byes or withdrawals.

Reigning champion Alan Merry was competing again. Although the International Master (IM) from Great Barton was top seed, he was held to a draw in the first round. He now had to avoid dropping any further points to stay in with a chance of catching those who, having won their games, now stood half-a-point ahead.

For a while in round three it looked like this wouldn’t be possible when rising star, nine-year-old Supratit Banerjee (Coulsden) set up his forces to hold Alan at bay. Deep into the fourth hour of their game, Merry eventually broke down Banerjee’s defences, winning a couple of pawns. Merry’s remaining pawns, combined with his Queen were enough to overcome Banerjee’s Rook and Bishop.


In this position from Merry – Banerjee, black set one last trap in an attempt to save a draw. He played 94 … Kh8, deliberately leaving his Bishop undefended. What had Banerjee planned in response to 95. Qxf7? Solution below.

The second seed in the Open section was IM Richard Pert. He was held to a third round draw by local chess star Jaden Jermy, who plays for the Bury St Edmunds Club. With Merry and Pert both winning in round four, they stood on 3½-points apiece half-a-point clear of the field, and would face each other to decide the tournament winner.

As it happened, their game ended in a draw, allowing the tournament’s third International Master, IM Neil Bradbury to catch up with the leaders by beating Nina Pert (Richard’s daughter, and an Women’s Candidate Master). The Open section therefore finished with a three-way tie for first place.

Elsewhere in the event Bury St Edmunds players featured prominently. Stephen Ruthen finished joint third in the Major and Peter Newton joint first in the Inter. Three of the four players who shared third position in the Inter were Bury St Edmunds Chess Club members: Craig Bradshaw and junior players Rowan Kent and Oliver Ferris. In the Minor, local player Chris Shepherd-Rose took second place, while two further Bury St Edmunds players, Mark Webb and George Robinson were amongst those tied for third. Meanwhile, Nickolay Starodubcevs-Snaiders picked up the prize for best junior player in the section.

Full results from the event are available on the tournament website:, but to fill in a couple of blanks, Max Pert (Richard’s son) and Supratit Banerjee finished just half-a-point behind the winners in the Open section and shared the junior prize fund between them.

Between rounds, the event also incorporated the presentation of the ECF President’s Award for Services to Chess. This was awarded to the seemingly indefatigable Bob Jones, stalwart of the chess scene in East Anglia, especially Suffolk and of course Bury St Edmunds. The presentation was made by Stephen Lewis, president of the Suffolk County Chess Association, who is pictured above with Bob. As the official silverware hadn’t arrived in time, Bob holds a “stand in” trophy, that for ECF Club of the Year 1988, awarded to Stowmarket Chess Club, largely due to the efforts of Bob himself who was a key player in that club at the time.

Some of Bob’s many contributions are listed in an article on the Suffolk Chess website ( Amongst them is having organized the Bury St Edmunds Congress from 1999 to 2014 inclusive, and helping to establish the Bury Knights Junior Chess Club, which has now been running for over 30 years, with Bob still at the helm.

It is notable how many of the players named above have at some point benefitted from his efforts: Alan Merry, Jaden Jermy, Peter Newton, Rowan Kent, Oliver Ferris and Nickolay Starodubcevs-Snaiders are all alumni of the Bury Knights Junior Chess Club. IM Richard Pert and his brother Grand Master Nick Pert also grew up playing in Suffolk Junior Chess events that Bob organised.

The organising team of the Bury St Edmunds Chess Congress (namely Steve Lovell, John Wickham and Paul Kemp) would like to thank the tournament sponsors, the Bury Area Chess League and the Patrick Ribbands Legacy Fund, to thank various volunteers who helped with setting up the venue and clearing away afterwards. Thanks are also due to Chess & Bridge ( who supplied all our sets, boards and clocks, and likewise to the wonderful team at the Moreton Hall Community Centre who did so much to help the event run smoothly.

Puzzle Solution:

After Qxf7, the black king has no moves. If the rook can also be given up, it would be stalemate and Banerjee would escape with a draw. So in response to Qxf7, Black had planned Rxa6+. The desperdo rook can continue to give checks from a7 and a8, forcing White to either capture it and accept a draw by stalemate, to succumb to a draw by perpetual check (or worse if the white king steps onto the wrong squares trying to avoid this, when he will lose the queen to Ra7+ skewering the king and queen).

If you solved this puzzle, or enjoyed trying, you might be interested in joining a chess club. Bury St Edmunds Chess Club meets on Thursday evenings at the Moreton Hall Community Centre. Find out more at There are several other clubs around the region, and you can find the closest one to you using the ECF Club Finder.

2021 Round Up

The weekend of 23/24 October saw the 38th Bury St Edmunds Chess Congress held at Moreton Hall Community Centre. Having been held at the Apex in the town centre for several years, that venue had become financially unviable. Increasing hire costs meant we needed to be fully booked to break-even, and uncertainty around Covid made that an even riskier prospect that usual. Alternative venues of a similar capacity to the Apex are in short supply in Bury St Edmunds, so we opted for the smaller community centre, which is also the home of the Bury St Edmunds Chess Club. As it turned out, we needn’t have feared a low attendance. Players starved of over-the-board chess by Covid restrictions were more eager to play than ever. We swiftly reached our capacity of 90 players and at points had a reserve list of more than 30.

After four rounds of competitive chess, we entered round 5, the last round, with a close contest in all three sections. The Open section had, as usual, several very strong chess players. The two top seeds, Richard Pert and Alan Merry, both on 3.5 points, played each other. They are both International Masters. Richard is originally from Ipswich and Alan lives close to Bury St Edmunds.

In this event the players each had 90 minutes fixed time for the game but in addition received an extra 15 seconds for each move made. A position was reached where Alan had two Queens and a Rook plus a pawn against Richards Queen, Rook, Knight and three pawns but Richard could capture Alan’s Rook giving him a slight plus. Both players only had seconds to make their moves and unfortunately as Rich was about to Capture the Rook his time ran out. Alan thus won and with 4.5 points could not be caught up by the five players who were on 3 points after round 4. All five games were drawn and with one other player reaching 3.5 points there was seven players tied in second place.

In the Major Max Pert, Richard Pert’s son, was on 4 points after four wins. In fact he was the only player on maximum points which was a great performance from a 14th seeded player (based on rating) in the Major. He was up against Stuart Nelson on 3.5 points and with 6 others on 3 points Max knew a draw would be enough to win the section. The game finished first, after Stuart offered Max a draw. A very impressive performance by Max who may well be challenging his father in future years.

Stuarts draw put him on 4 points and guaranteed him at least a share on second place. Of the 6 players, two drew their games but the of the four others who were playing each other two won to make it a three way tie for second place. There was also an impressive performance by Mae Catabay to win the U15 Junior prize in this section.

The Minor after round 4 had Stephen Ashworth, from Ely, on 3.5 points and four players on 3 points which was another close contest. Stephen had a hard fought game with David May that ended in a draw meaning Stephen was guaranteed at least a share of first prize. Two of the other players, Colin White and Richard Dickinson, won their games, and thus tying for first place. A Junior, Jacob Liu won the U1400 rating prize and the U15 Junior prize was won by Rowan Kent.

The organisers would like to thank Chess & Bridge for supplying all our chess equipment, British Sugar for their financial support, and various local business (the Dragonfly, the Coffee House, the Moreton Hall, Moreton Hall Fish & Kebab) for offering discounts to those competing in the event.

Full details prizes won, cross-tables and round-by-round results via our results page. Games from the Open section will also be available to play through in the coming days. You may also be interested in Brendan O’Gorman’s great photos of the event.

Main text by John Wickham with additions from Steve Lovell

Plans for 2021

We have noticed interest on our website and on our Facebook page regarding this year’s Congress. It is our aim to hold the Congress this year, but we are awaiting the Government’s announcement regarding the extent of further relaxation of Covid restrictions on 19th July. If, as seems likely, the restrictions are relaxed sufficiently we will invite entries.

Due to increasing costs to hire the venue at the Apex, we have had to seek a different venue but have not found a similar affordable one to date. This year we have booked Moreton Hall Community Centre, on the outskirts of Bury St Edmunds, for 23rd and 24th October 2021. This is a smaller venue and numbers will be limited to 90. For the future, we will be seeking a larger venue, should one be available.

We will be inviting online entries via the website with a copy entry form on the ECF Calendar, our Facebook page, and on the Congress website. Previous participants can expect an email from us once we are open for entries.

Why there will be no 2020 event


As you’ll already have seen, we’ve come to the sad conclusion that there will be no Bury St Edmunds Chess Congress in 2020. We’d like to take some time to explain why, and to share some early thoughts about alternative ideas for this year and plans for 2021.

Venue Issues

We’ve been at the Apex, right in the centre of town, since moving there from the Corn Exchange in 2010. It proved to be an excellent venue for our event. When I took over the organising of the event from Bob Jones in 2015, the venue was costing a little over £2,000 to hire for the weekend. That was already a large sum, but by finding savings elsewhere, securing extra sponsorship in some years, and a bumper entry in other years, we’ve been able to keep the finances in balance. The costs have steadily increased since then, but in respect of 2020 we were facing a futher increase of around 25%, taking the costs to over £3,000.

We immediately began thinking about a change of venue. As Bury is a relatively small town, there aren’t many options, and there would be no telling if we could have any new venue on the dates we’d originally advertised. After thinking it over we decided to stay with the Apex for another year if we could at least match our previous years’ sponsorship, nudge up the entry fees, and perhaps be a little less generous with any discretionary prizes. To break even we’d still be depending on another big turnout, but a small financial loss would be acceptable.


That was our thinking, and then COVID-19 hit. At the time of writing we’ve been in lockdown for almost four weeks, and speculation about how long it will last is rife. While we’re obviously hoping that the restrictions on public life will be lifted by the time of our event in the Autumn, many voices seem to be suggesting that some form of social distancing will still be necessary. If that’s the case, we’re likely to get fewer entries, perhaps especially from more vulnerable senior players, who usually make up a significant proportion of our entries. The numbers required for us to break even begin to seem like a stretch. The venue was pressing for confirmation plus a non-refundable deposit of £500. With some sponsors yet to be confirmed, we decided we couldn’t take the risk.

Moreover, while we’re in lockdown, it’s not now possible to do the necessary leg work to find an alternative venue in an aim to reduce costs. Checkmate.

What Now?

We’ll be looking for a new venue for the 2021 event. By then COVID-19 shouldn’t be an issue, but the costs at the Apex are simply not sustainable for an event such as ours. If you have any thoughts about what makes for a good venue, feel free to share them in the comments here, via our social media channels, our contact form or over email.

For 2020 we’re considering holding an online tournament around the same time of year that the Bury St Edmunds Congress usually takes place. Details are yet to be decided, but if this goes ahead (and it is very much an if at this stage) it’s likely to be a one day Rapidplay event, open to ECF members and with at least some prize money available. If entry isn’t free, it will certainly be no more than £5.

We’re really sorry to be disappointing all who have been loyal supporters of our event over the years, and hope you’ll be back with us again in 2021. In the meantime, watch this space for more news about plans for this Autumn and next. Stay safe.

FIDE Rated Open Section?

Ever since the ECF introduced its membership system, we’ve regularly had questions asking if we would consider making the Open section of our event FIDE rated. There are several attractive aspects to this idea:

  • We’d regain our position as a qualifying event for the British Championships. The ECF changed the conditions of eligibility a few years back, and for a single event such as ours to be considered a qualifying event, it must now be FIDE rated.
  • It feels like it would give our event a “higher standing” in some sense.

However, the idea is not without problems:

  • While most entrants to our Open section are Gold members of the ECF, not all are, and it’s Gold membership which is required to enable FIDE rating.
  • While FIDE regulations remain as they are, unless we had a rating ceiling for the Open section (!?), we couldn’t meet their conditions without either removing a round or shifting round 1 to Friday evening. Lots of congresses have round 1 on the Friday evening, but it would significantly change the character of our event, and moreover we’d incur a large increase in our hire costs for the venue, which we would in turn have to pass on to our entrants. I’d expect the increases to be at least 50% and likely more than that.

I gather there is some talk of FIDE making the restrictions on rated tournaments less restrictive, and if that came to pass we’d certainly be revisiting this question as the second problem noted above would be circumvented entirely.

What do readers think about this issue? Is my attempted statement of the pros and cons accurate and complete, and have we drawn the right conclusion in not making any section of the event FIDE rated?

Comments from readers with a better understanding of the current and possible future FIDE regulations would be particularly appreciated.

Congress Prizes

Not sure who, if anyone, will be reading this the first post on the Bury St Edmunds Chess Congress blog. You’ll find me posting here occasional oddments relating to our event, and perhaps sometimes things related to chess events more generally.

A question to begin with: to what extent does prize money available for a tournament make you more likely to enter? Winning a large prize would no doubt be a boon, but with the prize winners being a small proportion of the entrants overall, I’m wondering whether it would make sense for us to organise things differently. We could offer no prizes and massively reduce the entrance fee, or lessen our reliance on sponsors. Or we could use the saving to invest and improve the tournament conditions.

What do you think? Our current prize schedule can be found here. You’ll see that in addition to the monetary prizes we are also (at the time of writing) offering membership prizes. There is also a handsome trophy for the best local junior. How would you like prizes to be organised? What’s most motivating? And are there other things you’d prefer we spend the money on? Please leave your thoughts in the comments.

On a side note, I have occasionally wondered about some amusing prizes I could add to our schedule, and to explain them I will need to take a rather circuitous route.

As some of you may know, in spring 2018 we added a small dog to our family. I’m still rather surprised that my wife and daughter went with my name suggestion: Magnus. Anyone else got chess “themed” pets? One of my chess club colleagues said it was quite wrong to call our dog Magnus, as Magnus is supposed to be the G.O.A.T. and not a dog, but anyway …

Having easy access to this Magnus give me the chance to offer some great/weird sounding prizes:

  • Play a game with Magnus
  • Thirty minutes 1-to-1 with Magnus
  • A lick from Magnus
  • Rub Magnus’ tummy

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: SpicePress by SpiceThemes